EVROPSKI POKRET U SRBIJI

TRANSNATIONAL PROJECT 2002

- REPORT -

I ROUND TABLE

THE ROLE OF NONGOVERMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN IMPROVING ECONOMIC REFORMS: EU PRACTICES AND EXPERIENCES

Novi Sad, July 2002

Mr. Dragomir Vasic, NGO European Vojvodina President has opened the workshop. He welcomed all participants by presenting the agenda and introduced the Vice-president of Serbian Government, Mr. Milorad Isakov.

Mr. Isakov reminded how important NGO role was in the period of political changes during 2000 as well as in development of civil society in transition period that followed.
He has also expressed a hope that nongovernmental sector will make a strong connections between governmental and profitable sector.

Mr. Danijel Pantic, Secretary General has presented European Movement in Serbia. He made a short presentation of ten years of activities in the time well known by the very hard conditions for the existence of nongovernmental organizations; he presented numbers of projects organized as EMinS way of fight for democratic changes and democratic consolidation with partner from Government, nongovernmental and profitable sector after the elections 2000.
Mr. Pantic also obtained a public opinion that said almost 80% of citizens were unsatisfied with the results Government reached in last two years. There for he described a new set
of coalition between nongovernmental and governmental sector established through entrepreneurs support.
He presented first actions in that direction :
- Founding of Euro Info Centre in aim of business information exchanges
- Public procurement law preparation and rule of NGO in making a draft
- Creation of software for Municipalities that will provide direct trade for SME's in public procurement and cooperation of 30 Local Councils in Serbia and Municipalities on this project
- Cooperation of NGOs and Public diplomacy
- Public hearings

Mr. Goran Cetinic presented basic terms on poverty:
Bottom line for poverty is 1$ spent per person per day!
In 1990 under this average were 14% of citizens and increased in 1999 to 33%! This data was given by Strategic Marketing who did the research for UN and a number of domestic organizations. Opinion of some experts is that this percentage is much higher since Kosovo was not included in the research.
Mr. Cetinic presented a strategy for reducing the poverty through PRSP project which includes 23 countries from Africa, Turkey, Albania, and Moldavia. This project is in a middle of arranging a strategic Paper for Yugoslavia by Government of FRY, World Bank and PRSP. The first phase is researching in order to present the part of society that is the most jeopardize and will last from July 2002 to Jun 2003.
Goran Cetinic especially pointed at the problem of micro financing that does not function in our country although it would contribute the quicker development.

Mr. Vlada Grbic presented forms of economic organizations in West Europe and successful models that should be followed. Ha had also given some information on how these organizations fundraised and what was the Governmental financial support.
The situation in this area is pretty much confused since there are no sorted data of structures and numbers of organizations in Yugoslavia. The assumption is there are at least 4000 different unions but most of them are trading with fruits and vegetables.
Miroslav Vukovic, INKO, made a Power Point presentation of software "Internet Public Procurement in Serbia" developed by INCO within TASPP Project which includes 28 municipalities in Serbia.

Participant's questions

Laslo Darabus, Reformists of Vojvodina

How to improve the production and how to employ the unemployed? What is the NGO role in this process? What European Movement can do to change the environment- by lobbing or…?

Cetinic: This is a very difficult period for banking system - heritage from past and absence of any competition. Banks that were given sources for small and medium enterprises were not able to distribute it . Micro credits do not exist in our country which is hard to believe. NGOs might lobby and become subjects which provide micro credits ( like UNHCR during Milosevic's rule).
European Movement and its Economical Form will accept every initiative.

D.Pantic: There are two types of NGOs: the ones that take care of interest of its own members and the other that deals with general society problems. Problem that this sector has is a lack of information about organization's activities and it's mostly thanks to the media; there is no synchronization between domestic and foreign NGOs. Contrary to the desire for splitting jobs, everybody should work according to its organizations' goals and there should exist competition because it leads to the improvement of the overall situation , to reforms and market opening since in the world the most valuable are goods, informations and knowledge. European movement participates in this process through series of one day seminars "How to prepare business plan" led by Zvonko Brnjas.

Miroslav Vrtunski, d.o.o. "Vrt":
How to stimulate people who own home-saved money to invest?
G.Cetinic: There is foreign currency inflow from real estate in Croatia. The amount is big enough but it is not a sign of wealthy because individual amounts are small.

D. Pantic: Lack of business culture is obvious - everybody seeks for money but has no projects to support the credit. They are avoiding gendering into any kind of cooperation. Home-saved money is the result of the actions on a various black markets, so it is reasonable those people have no confidence in legal system.

Cedomir Keco, Reformists of Vojvodina: Speaking of poverty citizens of Vojvodina are dealing with many difficulties. National income per person in 1990 in Vojvodina was 3.090,00 US$, today it is barely over 1.000,00 US$. Vojvodina deals with number of internal problems. We also find hard to explain that what we have doesn't mean the other don't, on the contrary. The only region that means something in this country has been left with no initial capital after ten years of catastrophe. System did not change its approach toward the region which stands for county developing machine, there are no progressive laws not even for the agriculture. I would like just to mention the problems that occurred ion the migration period - growth of black economy. Government has no reformation approach in order to solve difficulties. It looks like they are using the Milosevic's methods, only with more style. It brings new problems and leads to the poverty. I think NGOs should put more effort during the process of changes toward legal regulations .

Cetinic: Transformation from black to legal market was achieved by the micro credit system in the other courtiers in transition. Another goal is to reach a decentralization of decision making and NGOs are struggling for it. The poverty reduction strategic is consisting of all of facts you mentioned .

Pantic: There is no injustice in the privatization. We are just in the worst period of this process. We can no talk about any serious development without steady investments.

Grbic: Local governments reforms are to be done first, as well as the improving the leading subjects in the process of development and that are SMEs.

II ROUND TABLE

THE ROLE OF NONGOVERMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN IMPROVING ECONOMIC REFORMS: EU PRACTICES AND EXPERIENCES


Working Meeting, Belgrade July, 2002


Mr. Vojin Dimitrijevic, NGO Belgrade Center for Human Rights President has opened the meeting. He welcomed all participants by presenting the result from Novi Sad Round Table and introduced Mr. Marko Nicovic.

Mr. Marko Nicovic, expert in economic criminal explained the current situation in Serbia concerning economy and role of NGO's in monitoring economic reforms in order to prevent economic criminal and improve possibilities of our country to for fill conditions for entering the EU.

Mr. Mihajlo Vasiljevic, president of NGO Generation 21, especially appointed problems of young people in process of economic reforms. He recommended cooperation of youth NGO's in preparing wide and profound programe with the Ministry of Economy and Finance and Ministry of Sport and Youth in order to improve financial situation of young people in Serbia.

This round table was highly visible event, with good media coverage and was attended by more than forty representatives from different institutions. It is important to say that participants were from:

ˇ Federal and republic ministries
ˇ Representatives of Youth NGO's
ˇ Students interested in this subject

II ROUND TABLE


''The Fifth Enlargement of the European Union - Consequences for Serbia and Montenegro''

The second Round table was held on 11th of February 2003, in the facilities of European movement in Serbia with a working title "The Fifth Enlargement of the European Union - Consequences for Serbia and Montenegro". The speakers were:

ˇ Mr. Jan-Willem Blankert - Delegation of the European Commission to the FRY (Serbia and Montenegro)
ˇ Mr. Duško Lopandić - European Movement in Serbia
ˇ Mr. Mihailo Crnobrnja - Ministry for foreign economic relations, Republic of Serbia
ˇ Mr. Radovan Vukadinović - Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac


This round table was highly visible event, with good media coverage and was attended by more than forty representatives from different institutions. It is important to say that participants were from:

ˇ Federal and republic ministries
ˇ Federal and republic parliament
ˇ Members of the Commission for the coordination of the accession process to the EU
ˇ Members of the Federal Office for the EU accession
ˇ Members of the Forum for International Relations
ˇ Students interested in this subject


One and maybe the most important conclusions of this debate was that no accession to the EU is possible without greatly needed consensus of all political parties. Our country needs to find a way to create and (even more important) to keep the political stability, to consolidate democracy and bring back the trust in the institutions. The tempo in which we are going to get closer to the, we can know easily say, Europe - since the European Union is likely to become the Europe it self - is predominately determined by our selves, by the speed in which we are conducting reforms in our on home.

At the contrary to the Central Europe which went quite calmly through the transition period, with no significant confrontations, and certainly with no open bloodsheds; the Western Balkan region had ten years of crises, ethnic confrontations and bloodsheds. All countries of this region have the same symptoms: insufficient stability of democratic institutions, undeveloped civil society, constant political confrontations, unsolved ethnic problems, etc. Nevertheless all of these countries have a highly noticeable desire to become member of the European Union, and in that way to convert to a prominent member of a family of democratic nations of Europe.

Serbia and Montenegro are among the last countries of this region which headed towards the EU and according to that the country (or the Union) with a longest lane to Brussels. It is clear that the integration process can not build up independently from the situation in the country - quite the opposite. First steps are in democratization of society, creating the rule of law and market economy. Considering the time that we have lost on the internal confrontations we need, now to work simultaneously on raising the level of political stability in the country and on creating the common strategy with the Western Balkan countries. We need to coordinate our approach to the EU in questions of mutual interest. On the other hand that kind of approach would most certainly be a kind of a good encouragement for the EU to create certain pre-accession strategy for this region. The Thessalonica meeting, which will be held on 21st of Jun, should be a right place for EU to show that the Western Balkan countries are potential candidates for EU membership. The EU should not seize it self as closed fortress in which "barbarians" shell no enter, but we should also be aware that we will not be able to enter that "elite club" until we fulfill some prerequisites. The thing gets even more complicated when you look at the EU as a moving target, each waste of time on the internal confrontations will add few more steps on this already very long road to Europe.